On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:09, Hesham Soliman (EAB) wrote:
> => But is this the only problem? I mean even if there is
> a way of making apps using UDP react correctly to address
> changes, is it not possible that some apps would want to
> make sure that they are still talking to the _same_peer_
> and not just the same application on another host?
I expect so. That's what I meant when I was talking about authenticating
the binding. Other applications might not care and might prefer a quick,
if insecure, redirect instead.
> => There was a reference made that the draft deals with
> stateful applications.
Indeed. How does one recognize a stateful application on L3? [Unless we
require the application to indicate this explicitly.]
MikaL
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
