>>>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:13:32 -0500,
>>>>> Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> We did some interoperability testing thof independent DHCPv6 implementations
> at the recent TAHI interoperability testing event. I've published a list
> of issues, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-00.txt, identified through the
> interoperability testing.
> The DHCPv6 specification has been accepted as a Proposed Standard, but has
> not yet been published as an RFC. To improve the text in the spec based on
> our experience with the interoperability testing, I will make the editorial
> clarifications listed as "resolution" in
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-00.txt prior to publication of the DHCPv6 RFC.
> Please review draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-00.txt and respond with any
> comments to the dhcwg mailing list.
For the record, I fully support the action; I support the DHCPv6 spec
to be published, and I belive it would be great if the published
version of the DHCPv6 spec contains the clarifications described in
the dhcpv6-interop draft.
(Since I happened to have a chance to review the clarification draft
beforehand, I don't have further comments on it.)
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
