> Geoff Huston wrote: > Does that mean want to propose to use 2001:D0C0::/32 as well?
Gee, even I could remember that one! 2001:D0C::/32 would be even nicer, there are number of other alternatives such as 2001:2D0C::/32 and 2001:4D0C::/32. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
