A few comments on the individual submission.

big issues:
-----------

==> note to self and to the w.g.: this is very similar to Bellovin's
access-prefix draft, but simpler (with advantages / drawbacks that result
from that).  So, I believe it might be useful to try to compare these two
approaches so we could better understand which features are needed and which
are net.

==> note that if one sets the O field to 1 but forgets to set "Org
PrefixLen", org prefixlen defaults to zero, and makes all of the 
Internet a trusted, "in-organization" zone (as the field was previously
reserved").

This must be stated in the security considerations.

I would also recommend that the prefix length "0" in conjunction with
O-bit=0 is a special value which MUST be treated as equal to "none", 
and a possible error be logged.  This reduces the amount of flexibility
slightly, but the tradeoff seems too huge, otherwise.

     5. Security Considerations

==> it should be noted that a single on-off binary value
in-org,outside-of-org may not be granular/flexible enough,
and that as many attacks come from inside the organization (either by an
insider attack or breaking into a system in the organization and attacking
there), depending too heavily on security of the "in-organization" may not
be a good idea.

substantial/semi-editorial:
---------------------------

        Option format to allow the router to also advertise the length of
        the advertised prefix which belongs to the same organization (or
        other administrative entity). 

==> clarify "other administrative entity", think the point here was to say
like "not necessary the same organization, but also otherwise named, *same*
administrative entity"?

==> if not, this may require syncing elsewhere in the draft (where it
discusses same-org, same-admin-entity)

editorial:
----------

     IPv6 Working Group                                 Brian Zill
     Internet Draft                                     Microsoft

==> "IPv6 WG" is premature as this is not yet a w.g. document..?

==> the whole document should be shifted 5 characters to the left; it
exceeds the maximum line length.

     References

==> split the references explicitly, even though those are probably all
Normative.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to