> What is the benefit of doing so versus doing the change in ndpd? NDP working as designed in RFC 2461.
> In that case, it make sense to maintain the local subnet route > but remove the default route. Destination on the local subnet will > still be reachable, other further destination won't and we will not > try them. This can be done in ndpd. In another message I think I pointed out that we want NDP to work when there are no prefixes advertised with the O-bit set (even though the prefixes are on-link). For instance, this might be part of a potential solution to better deal with hidden terminal problems in wireless networks. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
