> A few points on your last issue. The NDP spec does state that if > two routers detect conflicting info in the RAs that they should > log a warning. > > That approach will help the operator with fixing the conflicting > info, but doesn't benefit the nodes that are receiving that info. > For them, perhaps what we should do is state that they should > honor the RA coming from the router with the lowest IPv6 address.
Yes, this is one way to resolve the conflict. But my point was really trying to be at a higher level: When there are different ways to config the same thing one needs to *think* about conflicts and conflict resolution. The answer might be some scheme for resolving the conflict, or that there isn't such a need for the particular thing that is configured. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
