] 
 ] >  ]  nor is it acceptable to treat site-local as a
 ] >  ] security mechanism.
 ] >
 ] > If they trust the SL as their security mechanism(like 99% of IPv4 users
 ] > do it today), its their problem not to use firewall, but it should not
 ] > be forbidden.
 ] 
 ] we can't forbid people from doing stupid things.  but neither should we 
 ] penalize every host, every router, every application in order to allow 
 ] people to do stupid things.
 ] 

i can't see your logic that when some hosts "stupidly" using 10.x.x.x
address, it actually penalized the hosts/applications who don't use
them. if your point is the global reachable hosts can't directly reach
those private hosts, well, that is part of the purpose to use
private addresses.

 ] --------------------------------------------------------------------
 ] IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
 ] IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
 ] FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
 ] Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] --------------------------------------------------------------------

- Naiming
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to