What I raised my hand for in San Francisco was to deprecate SL addresses as currently defined in draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt (and in RFC 2373).
I don't find this question ambiguous. It's true that we would have to revise the addressing architecture again as a result (probably simply by removing all reference to SL and reserving FEC0::/10), but that is editorial work. Brian Michel Py wrote: > > Margaret / Bob, > > What is this consensus about? I was hoping that the mailing list would > be asked to express their opinions _after_ a text to deprecate > site-local addressing had been submitted to the working group. In the > current situation, this consensus if there is one would be good only to > accept text as a working document. This document that still has to be > seen then should go to WG last call. > > Where is the doc to deprecate site-local addressing? > > Michel. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
