I didn't mean we should pull the current draft, which is already in the RFC queue. Obviously, if we get consensus on the principle, there is then follow up to respect the process. I didn't think that my words implied otherwise; I just want to take one step at a time.
Brian Michel Py wrote: > > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > What I raised my hand for in San Francisco was to > > deprecate SL addresses as currently defined in > > draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt (and in RFC 2373). > > This has never been stated and you can expect appeals all the way to the > supreme court and I'll be supporting them. This is not an editorial > change but a significant architectural change. > > I am tired of last-minute attempts to pull documents that have been > approved for publication. Brian, I have the greatest respect for you but > this is not to your credit. > > Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
