On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Michel Py wrote: > IMHO, the compromise approach such as the exclusive model Bob and you > came up with has more chances of success and a good starting point. If > the WG can't agree on such a thing I doubt it could agree on a solution > started from scratch.
Exclusive model is pretty much unworkable except: 1) as an access control mechanism; there are better methods for that 2) with disconnected sites -- and then "limited model" would also apply just great. I'm not personally that much opposed to the limited model, and could maybe even live with exclusive model -- but it depends on certain things (like site-border routers) that are unacceptable. The proposal doesn't seem to be be workable in practise, IMHO. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
