Pekka, > Pekka Savola wrote: > but it depends on certain things (like site-border routers) > that are unacceptable. The proposal doesn't seem to be be > workable in practise, IMHO.
This is speculation, also called FUD and does not lead to making progress. > I'm not personally that much opposed to the limited model, > and could maybe even live with exclusive model This is the real deal: I am myself favorable to the moderate model, but I could leave with the exclusive model. We are talking about what could reach consensus here, not about what everybody would like to have. >From my chair, the model that could reach consensus is the exclusive model. It's a compromise, and as such nobody likes it but it also means that it is something that everybody could live with. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
