I agree.

--On Friday, May 30, 2003 15:26 -0700 Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I don't follow this.  It seems to me that there are two points on the
allocation spectrum that are useful.  At one end there is a central
registry for organizations that are willing to pay something and want
some higher assurance of uniqueness (and a way to reconcile disputes).
At the other end is local generation of pseudo-random identifiers.  If
people want to set up web sites that generate the pseudo-random numbers
for this purpose, that is fine too.  I don't see any need for something
in between the two approaches.  The value of a registry is to have a
higher guarantee of uniqueness.  Other than that they should be generated
locally.



Hans Kruse, Associate Professor J. Warren McClure School of Communication Systems Management Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to