Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> Using myself as the example...
> 
> Does anyone else find it sub-optimal that we are spending so
> much time arguing about what address bits should be used for
> local addressing when we have yet to gain consensus on:
> 
>          - The requirements for local addressing?
>          - The best technical mechanism(s) to meet those
>                  requirements?
>          - Whether we need local addressing at all?

I maintain that it is 100% clear that we need limited-scope
addressing, and since we will never have a precise definition
of a "site", we'd better not waste our time trying to define
"site local" precisely.

> 
> Let's figure out what we really need, and _then_ argue about
> the specifics of where to put the address space.
> 
> Did anyone want to comment on Tony's requirements document
> and/or propose an alternative set of requirements?

I think we should take that draft as good enough, and discuss 
Bob's proposal as a solution to those requirements.

   Brain

> 
> Margaret
> 
> At 11:02 AM 6/7/2003 -0400, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >At 03:46 PM 6/6/2003 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> >>I still have a small preference preference for using FC00::/7 for the
> >>globally unique local addresses due to the larger global ID, instead of
> >>reusing the FEC0::/10 prefix.  But either would work.
> >
> >The problem with using FECO::/10 for these addresses is that there
> >are implementations that include special semantics to handle
> >the ambiguity of FECO::/10 addresses, such as requiring a Zone ID
> >to disambiguate FECO::/10 addresses, setting up separate routing
> >tables for separate FECO::/10 zones, etc.
> >
> >In Bob's proposal, addresses are globally unique (although
> >they may not be globally routed), so we don't need special
> >semantics to handle the ambiguity.
> >
> >Margaret


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to