Margaret Wasserman wrote:

At 10:39 AM 7/16/2003 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:

Lately I find myself wondering if there's not room for a uniform layer 2.5
interface that is designed to work over a set of bridged 802-style layer 2
networks, but presents a slightly different interface to the host. So for
instance hosts would be explicitly required to announce presence on a link (no
more passive waiting for ARP requests), there would be an explicit L2.5
multicast join/leave (no more sniffing for L3 multicast requests) [...]


(has this already been worked on and I just don't know about it?)

See also
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-perlman-zerouter-rbridge-00.txt
It doesn't address authenticating link access.

I think that the idea of Dave Thaler's draft, though (and similar
work by others) is to switch at layer 3, so that there is no need
for layer 2 switching in this type of environment.

Right.


And also to providing bridging of IP traffic across link layers that
don't use 48bit 802-style L2 addressing.

- aidan



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to