Hi,
related to the previous comment by Jaehoon Paul, I strongly support specifying (also)
a stateless mechanism for IPv6 DNS discovery.
(Stateless) DHCPv6 can provide a solution, but still we need a stateless mechanism for
environments where DHCPv6 is not used. And I really believe that there are / will be
such environments.
Cheers,
-Juha W.-
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Jaehoon Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 July, 2003 04:20
To: Alain Durand
Cc: IPv6 WG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DNS discovery discussion
That's Okay.
I appreciate your previous work related to DNS discovery until now.
I really hope we'll solve the issue successfully.
Thanks.
Jaehoon Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alain Durand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaehoon Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "IPv6 WG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: DNS discovery discussion
>
> This discussion has been going on in the v6 wg for a while without
> success,
> it is now to dnsop, let's go there and hope we'll make progress.
> no need to crosspost, IMHO.
>
> - Alain.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
