> The chairs have read all of the messages on the list, and based on your > considerable input, we have determined that the IPv6 WG does have rough > consensus to deprecate the usage of IPv6 site-local unicast addressing AND > to investigate alternative mechanisms for local addressing and local access . control.
humm - it is not all that often that we have said that 2/3 is rough consensus in the IETF - in my exterience if 1/3 is not in support then I would not claim consensus (even 6 grit) - 3/4 would be very rough indeed, 5/6 would be the mininum I would say was "rough consensus" just when does "rough consensus" faid out in this model? Scott -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
