Below... > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 August 2003 21:48 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Let's abolish scope > > > > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:58:22 +0200 > > From: Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Organization: IBM > > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) > > X-Accept-Language: en,fr,de > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Let's abolish scope [Re: Unicast scope field (was: > Moving forward on > > Site-Local and Local Addressing)] > > > > Well, here's my attempt at becoming flame bait :-) > > Actually, this is the clearest summry of the current situation I've > seen yet.
... Which makes it doubly annoying that I didn't receive the original mail from Brian. And this is only one of many examples I could give of replies to mail on this list for which I have never received the original mail. I suspect this may be a consequence of the volume of mail to the list in recent days. That doesn't make it excusable though. Given Sun's recent admission that they aren't competent to run an IPv6-enabled webserver, should they be managing the mailserver for this list? Mat -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
