Tony, > Tony Hain wrote: > Insisting on a single address per interface is the only > way to avoid address selection.
There are ample comments that a lot of enterprise managers will be favorable to that concept. > This whole discussion is about multihoming It has always been the sticking point. > which points out the failure of the approach to move the > multihoming discussion into a separate WG. Multi6 should > be closed NOW. As a matter of fact, by reading its charter it should have been rechartered or shutdown in September 2001, almost two years ago. But I hear that being two years behind objectives without any result is not a big deal in the IETF. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
