There is real danger here; I have already started to see mailing list discussion going something like:
Q. What address prefix do I use for this network before I get my provider prefix?
A1. Use FECO (Site Local).
A2. No, No, FECO has been outlawed by the IETF, just invent a prefix!
I have seen the 2002 mapping of RFC 1918 suggested.
"Private" space will appear -- I want a version that is thought out, that is well documented and understood, not a mish-mash of hijacked prefixes and IPv6'afied RFC1918 stuff.
Perhaps you havn't seen 'draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-02.txt'?
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
