Zefram wrote: > I oppose your idea of having allocated prefixes be numerically related, > because it defeats the aim of having no discernable structure in the > prefix IDs. Whoever generates the prefixes must do so randomly and > independently.
I don't see why this is a problem. The prefix generation could be done sequentially, it seems to me. Randomness makes it a _lot_ harder to guarantee uniqueness, for no good reason that I can see. Who cares if there is structure or not, when the prefixes aren't going to be routed? Regards, Charlie P. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
