Brian, > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I kept reading, because if these things are created they *will* > certainly end up being used as end point identifiers.
Can you develop why? In the absolute I can find lots of reasons but I don't see why the identifier/locator solution would prefer using these vs. having its own prefix. I agree that they would be used for NAT though, because NAT does not need anything to be invented. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
