Valid. If it goes to RFC status will that make you comfortable? thanks /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michel Py [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:11 PM > To: Bound, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: site-local observations from the outside > > > Jim, > > >>> Jim Bound wrote: > >>> If we simply say these NEVER leave the site then > >>> all is fine. Thats the bottom line. > > >> Michel Py wrote. > >> I'm ok with that. Not only never leave the site but > >> making >sure that they can't. > > > Even better yes. They "can't". > > You can't guarantee that for the Hinden/Haberman draft, which > is the reason I will not use it until we have a solution on a > PI-like setup. It's a matter of risk: If I use the > Hinden/Haberman draft as private addresses, and if it ends up > being perverted as PI, my entire network design goes to the > trash. If I hijack a random prefix for private addresses, the > risk of collisions although not null is a lot less. > > Michel. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
