-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> I'm expecting, by the way, that the deprecation will leave fec0::/10 >> to be treated as global-scope unicast addresses, rather than making >> fec0::/10 addresses cease to function altogether. > > That's an interesting expectation. As co-author of the planned > deprecation draft, I'd been assuming a more classical deprecation > action, in which we would simply state the previous semantics of > FEC0::/10, state that the prefix SHOULD NOT be used, but leave it > permanently assigned by IANA. > > This would break nothing that runs today. > > What do people think? >
As with reusing /8s in IPv4, keep as IANA reserved for a while, then use. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 iQA/AwUBPzkB8qarNKXTPFCVEQJ3XACgsCcM7FbMBmbPoTNl6Olbsz/iVPoAoNLX 5mOa6NR4cLbZpozUGb220Zai =GhoZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
