-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On onsdag, aug 6, 2003, at 06:40 Europe/Stockholm, Michel Py wrote: > That being said, the hard facts are that a) as of today 42% of my IPv6 > BGP routing table is made of /48s, /64s and other crud and b) lots of > ISP will think twice before refusing my $2.5k/yr to announce my prefix. That is also because the ISPs realize that the current ~400 routes are far from a problem. Actually the 130k routes in IPv4 is not creating a problem either. Other characteristics of BGP might, but I haven't seen a reference to the number of routes creating a problem. Yes, they will cost the ISPs money, but that is why they are accepting your money. Filtering routes have it's advantages, especially in IPv4. With 400 routes, I still fail to see the problem. On the contrary, it tells me we have plenty of time to solve the real problem. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 iQA/AwUBPzkKsqarNKXTPFCVEQLnngCgumYK3h6qjsqZyF3zPhVrr7EYAwwAnRH9 8u8GKMxnvcBIAxYq8hxIvmOT =/sYB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
