Jim, > Jim Bound wrote: > But seriously. When the parts get built as engineers we > have the responsibility to support the technical criteria > for what the user don't see in implementation and > architecture. In fact they trust us to do that. And > incorrect use of LLs I strongly believe can hurt users > as an engineer/architect and SLs are well.......
That's the kind of reasoning that got you playing in the junior league and forced you to adopt your competitor's proprietary protocols. Have you configured an HP ProCurve L3 switch recently? The CLI is a very incomplete and pale attempt at copying IOS and it even incorporates some Cisco proprietary protocols such as CDP (Cisco Discovery Protocol). Your company completely missed the boat on routers and switches, please enlighten us why you think you are right this time? > But I am here to make folks like you totally miserable :--) I have a few dispositions for that myself. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
