Leif Johansson wrote: > Keith Moore wrote: > > >On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:35:15 -0700 > >Fred Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Folks - do we have consensus to accept this document as an IPv6 wg > >>item (see below)? > >> > >> > > > >what does it mean to do this? > > > > > I'd also like an answer to this question.
As with all working group documents, it means that the resulting text will be something the working group has reached concensus on as worth publication. It does not mean that the existing text will be published as an RFC under the IPv6 WG name, but that it moves from being personal drafts where some might not be paying attention, to a draft-ipv6 name. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
