On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Michel Py wrote: > > Pekka Savola wrote: > > 1. Shouldn't we first see the requirements for site-local > > replacement (and other issues) and not jump straight to the > > requirements for local addressing? > > Do you mean that the Hain/Templin draft is too generic, or not specific > enough?
Yes. It takes for granted that we need local-use addressing, and lists a lot of requirements for local-use addressing (some of which are most probably redundant if you'd apply local-use addressing only to *specific* scenarios). What I'm trying to say is that we need to first figure out where we need local-use applications -- and, as an interim feature, maybe reword the current draft so that it's apparent which current perceived local-use scenarios require specific requirements. > >> 3.1 -- "Network managers have stated, and historical > >> experience has shown, that there is a need for addresses > >> that do not require public registration." > > > ==> there is no supporting evidence of this expect vague > > statements. Please be more explicit as I don't see how we > > can take this for given. > > Maybe you are too young to remember but network administrators have > hijacked addresses for ages, yep.. > which is one of the reasons that eventually > led to RFC1597. What makes you believe that the reasons they did it in > the past do not exist anymore? And what problems has this caused that are really, really problematic? If you have a disconnected network which you don't plan to connect without renumbering (which has to be done anyway), it doesn't matter if you hijack a prefix. On the other side, I fail to see the need to hijack a prefix for your running system. IPv6 addresses are quite obtainable nowadays if you're an equivalent of LIR. In addition, compared to the situation back in 1994 (and earlier), people actually use Routing Registries to check advertisements. You really cannot assume that you could hijack a prefix and have it work in the Internet. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
