Hello, James, Thank you for your comment. Just a quick question. As one of the authors of the draft, I am a bit confused.
You wrote: > The PKIX group is currently conducting Last Call on > draft-ietf-pkix-x509-ipaddr-as-extn-01.txt, which is designed to allow > certification of prefix delegation assignments (among other uses). I took a look it. > This draft might provide a solution for requirement 3.5 in > draft-ietf-prefix-delegation. Yes, I agree here at least as one of possibilities. However, >It might therefore be helpful to take a look at draft-ietf-pkix-x509 >before Last Call completes. ++++++ Why "before" ??? I think that prefix delegation requirement draft can go forward with or without draft-ietf-pkix-x509, isn't it ??? Shin Miyakawa, Ph.D Sr.Research Manager, IPv6 Group, Innovative IP Architecture Center NTT Communications Corporation Tokyo Opera City Tower 21st Floor 3-20-2 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan 163-1421 E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEL:+81-3-6800-3262 / FAX:+81-3-5365-2990 Visiting Researcher, SFC Lab. KEIO University WIDE Project -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
