> My understanding was that we didn't want the Node Requirements document
> be the bucket where we toss all of the fixes needed to various RFCs,
> etc.

FWIW, I think this is right approach.

> I assume that if addrconf needs updating, it should be done there,

OK. At least this previous co-author is shamed into agreeing that
addr-conf document should be revved. First step is a list of items
that need fixing. I believe I have a start of a list squirreled away
somewhere.

Thomas
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to