> My understanding was that we didn't want the Node Requirements document > be the bucket where we toss all of the fixes needed to various RFCs, > etc.
FWIW, I think this is right approach. > I assume that if addrconf needs updating, it should be done there, OK. At least this previous co-author is shamed into agreeing that addr-conf document should be revved. First step is a list of items that need fixing. I believe I have a start of a list squirreled away somewhere. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
