Chirayu Patel wrote:
Hi Fred,
I did a quick comparison with my set of comments, and I am happy. :-)
Just one minor point.
I had asked for adding text that would make it mandatory for each proposal to
include statistical analysis for
1) Probability of collision when "x" networks are merged, when "n" addresses have been chosen from the address space of "m" values.
2) Probability to choose a duplicate address after "a" addresses have been chosen from the address space of "m".
I see you have added a sentence stating that proposals should include statistical analysis. Is there any reason why you do not want to include the above two points?
My concern was that that text was tending toward very specific formulation but
I am not yet convinced that it captures the necessary and sufficient criteria for
analysis. I believe we are in fact beginning to see a distillation of the criteria
through the current wg discussions, but I don't think we are quite ready to write
a tight formal specification - perhaps soon.
BTW, the hain/templin -02 draft update is now available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-02.txt
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
