At 3:33 PM -0400 8/15/09, Stephen Kent wrote: >At 12:52 PM +0300 8/15/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote: >>C >>This document does not specify a mandatory-to-implement or a >>mandatory-to-use ticket format. The formats described in the following >>sub-sections are provided as useful examples, and implementers are free to >>adopt them as-is on change them in any way necessary. >> > >I though the agreement was that the ticket content, as well as format, was >entirely up to the implementer. If so, the text above is misleading, as it >suggests that the content is prescribed and only the format is up for grabs.
I disagree that the text suggests that the content is prescribed, but agree that this is a good place to remind the reader that the content is also implementation-specific. Proposed change: This document does not specify a particular ticket format nor even the suggested contents of a ticket: both are entirely up to the implementer. The formats described in the following ... --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
