I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html> ).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-09 Reviewer: Pete McCann Review Date: 2009-10-29 IETF LC End Date: 2009-10-28 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: One minor issue to discuss Major issues: none Minor issues: Section 2: As can be seen, the WESP format extends the standard ESP header by the first 4 octets for IPv4 and by 8 octets for IPv6. The WESP header is integrity protected, along with all the fields specified for ESP in RFC 4303. Normally ESP wouldn't need to process encapsulation headers that appear prior to the SPI. Won't this require modification of the ESP implementation, possibly breaking its modularity? Would it be problematic for certain algorithms to include this data? It might be good to state that. Nits/editorial comments: none _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
