This is probably a small thing, but in general the term "cluster" implies at least some degree of shared state among cluster members. I understand that there's some suggestion of that in saying that a cluster protects the same domain but there's really quite a bit more to it than that - it's going to things like the SADB or a subset of the SADB. It needn't be in real-time or near real-time, but it has to be there for it to be considered a cluster (rather than, say, multi-homing).
I don't think including that in the definition requires that the wg take on state synchronization among cluster members. Melinda _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
