Hi,

we have had a good deal of discussion of the HA solution at the Maastricht meeting and during the following weeks. Now, with my co-chair hat on, I'd like to suggest a way forward that I believe is in sync (bad pun intended) with the WG consensus.

I propose that version -01 of the draft should resolve the following 3 issues (and if possible, no others):

   * Separate negotiation of synchronization of the IKE SA counters vs.
     the IPsec SA counters. IPsec counter sync should work even when
     used with a "normal" IKE exchange (non-zero Message ID).
   * A scalable solution for the IPsec counter sync: send a delta
     value that applies to all (incoming) child SAs, instead of sending
     one value per child SA.
   * The replay issue that Tero identified at the meeting.

If this is NOT in line with the group's consensus, or if I missed something big, let me know.

Thanks,
    Yaron
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to