Done. On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> In reading this thread, I see Frederic saying that he is replacing text > and getting some pushback, but it feels like that his text is reasonable > as an addition to the security considerations. > > To close this issue and allow the document to go to IETF LC, I ask the > authors to replace 9.2 with the following text, which is a mixture of > the two proposals, with an extra paragraph break to show where the new > idea starts. Yaron and I will move this to the Area Director as soon as > we have a new draft. Thanks for all the work done so far! > > --Paul Hoffman On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:54 AM, IETF I-D Submission Tool wrote: > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ipsecme-failure-detection-04.txt has been > successfully submitted by Yoav Nir and posted to the IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-ipsecme-failure-detection > Revision: 04 > Title: A Quick Crash Detection Method for IKE > Creation_date: 2011-02-11 > WG ID: ipsecme > Number_of_pages: 23 > > Abstract: > This document describes an extension to the IKEv2 protocol that > allows for faster detection of SA desynchronization using a saved > token. > > When an IPsec tunnel between two IKEv2 peers is disconnected due to a > restart of one peer, it can take as much as several minutes for the > other peer to discover that the reboot has occurred, thus delaying > recovery. In this text we propose an extension to the protocol, that > allows for recovery immediately following the restart. > > > > The IETF Secretariat. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
