Hi everyone,
The 2-week LC period is up today. I'm afraid we got much less review
than we would have liked, and further review/comments would be very welcome.
However since we've had good WG input on earlier iterations of this
document, we are asking Sean, the security AD, to progress the draft.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 03/09/2011 09:34 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
This begins a two-week Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol. You can find the current version at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol-04. We
want everyone in the WG to read the document and comment on it, even if
the comment is "I support this" or "I am neutral on this". If you oppose
moving the draft forwards, or you have technical changes you want made,
please be explicit in your message. Feel free to start new threads if
you are objecting or suggesting changes. The authors will manage any
such discussions using the issue tracker.
The WG previously reached consensus on a problem statement for IPsec
High Availability, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6027. You may wish to
refer to that RFC, first, to frame the problem, and second, to convince
yourselves that the current document actually addresses it in full.
Thanks,
Yaron
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
