Yoav Nir writes: > I have mixed feelings about this. It's better than all four of those > drafts advancing separately. OTOH this plug-innable architecture is > pretty much admitting defeat. It sets us up to have a situation like > EAP, with lots of different methods, and no guide to implementers as > to which methods to implement.
I agree on that, and as I stated in my email we did fail in WG... > But I guess it's the lesser evil. Thats the idea. I think the worst situation is if all of the 4 drafts gets published as RFC as they are now and then implementors will be even more lost which one to implement. Trying to convince even some of those draft authors to merge their proposal, or pick one of the others seems to be impossible. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
