I am definitely interested in attending. Weds night works here.
On 10/28/2011 3:09 PM, Stephen Hanna wrote:
I agree. Wednesday night would be best.
Who else is interested in getting together to discuss this? Clearly,
there are plenty of interesting issues to discuss.
Steve
*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
Behalf Of *Yoav Nir
*Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2011 10:00 AM
*To:* Geoffrey Huang; Stephen Hanna
*Cc:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [IPsec] New -00 draft: Creating Large Scale Mesh VPNs
Problem
Well, there is a free room between 1300-1500 on Wednesday, but then
we're opposite WebSec, and I can't attend.
Our best bet is to do it after the Plenary. The plenary ends at 19:30,
and people might want to grab something to eat, so it would probably
be best to do it at 20:00.
Hope you don't have a flight for Wednesday night...
On 10/26/11 10:19 PM, "Geoffrey Huang" <[email protected]
<blockedmailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have to agree with the recent comments about the inapplicability
of RFC 4322. I don't think that a DNNSEC infrastructure can be
assumed, particularly not in the deployments I have seen.
I agree with Steve Hanna's comments about the need for ad-hoc
peer-to-peer VPNs, bypassing a centralized hub. I also agree with
Paul Hoffman's comments about using an already-existing "trusted
introducer."
Finally, I will be in Taiwan, but specifically (only) to discuss
this topic. I'm hoping that the date of Wednesday, November 16 is
still good for the bar BOF that some of us had previously discussed.
-geoff
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
