>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Boltz <[email protected]> writes:
Mark> With all due respect to Cisco, the larger problem we're trying
Mark> to address, is in part the fact that DMVPN and ACVPN are
Mark> vendor specific implementations. And the goal of the
Mark> implementation we're seeking is *large scale* P2P VPNs.
Assume that they are available on a wide variety of platforms, what is
broken in the technology?
Mark> Picture a hypothetical where a larger interest desires an
Mark> IPsec VPN, in, say the airline industry. We're talking about
Mark> several thousand aircraft from several manufacturers. All in
We've been through all of this 15 years ago with AIAG's ANX.
Mark> Explain to me how the earlier discussion of DNSSEC, or any
Mark> other supposed, " but we already have a solution" addresses
Mark> that type of "large-scale, P2P VPN". And please do so in a
Mark> standards-based, non-proprietary way, that accommodates
Mark> 10,000+ gateways, independent of vendors, and won't take me 10
Mark> years to configure.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
