+1

On Nov 27, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Charlie Kaufman wrote:

> I believe this errata should be marked "Verified". This is pretty clearly a 
> case where the document was updated in one place and a needed corresponding 
> update in another place was missed.
> 
>       --Charlie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 2:53 AM
> To: Charlie Kaufman; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5996 (3036)
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5996, "Internet Key 
> Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5996&eid=3036
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Valery Smyslov <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 3.10
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      [...] Of the notifications defined in this document, the SPI is
>      included only with INVALID_SELECTORS and REKEY_SA.
> 
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      [...] Of the notifications defined in this document, the SPI is
>      included only with INVALID_SELECTORS, REKEY_SA and CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Original text was carried over from RFC4306 and contradicts with the text in 
> section 2.25, which clearly says that SPI field in CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND 
> notification is populated. Notification CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND was not defined in 
> RFC4306, and the whole section 2.25 is new to RFC5996.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use 
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a 
> decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the 
> status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5996 (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
> Publication Date    : September 2010
> Author(s)           : C. Kaufman, P. Hoffman, Y. Nir, P. Eronen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> 
> 
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to