It seems to me that the NAT problem is a *NAT* problem, not an AH problem. I'd want to hear from the wireless guys that they think ESP NULL is a reasonable substitute for AH, too.
More generally the only reason I can see for moving something to historic is if it's not implemented and the environment has changed sufficiently so that it probably shouldn't be implemented. Don't think AH is there yet and I don't think it's a win to push more stuff into the publication queue. I'm not really against this but I'm definitely not in support of it. Melinda _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
