Hi, I have posted a new draft "Avoiding Authentication Header (AH)"
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bhatia-ipsecme-avoiding-ah-00.txt Hopefully this will help us focus on the technical, rather than the process related contents in the draft. The message remains the same, which is that we should NOT use AH for any newer applications and protocols since ESP with NULL encryption algorithm is a better alternative. Looking forward to hearing from the WG. Cheers, Manav -----Original Message----- From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2012 10:03 PM To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav) Cc: <[email protected]>; IPsecme WG Subject: Re: [IPsec] Moving Authentication Header (AH) to Historic On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > To get around this process problem do you suggest that I publish a new draft > - "Avoiding Authentication Header (AH)" that's mostly a copy-paste of my > current draft? Yep, that would work. It would also cut off the chin-scratching about "what does Historic really mean" and let us focus on what you actually want, which is people not using AH. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
