Second issue. Please comment on the suggested resolution. Thanks,
Steve -----Original Message----- From: ipsecme issue tracker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:49 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [ipsecme] #211: We should talk more about why this is a hard problem. #211: We should talk more about why this is a hard problem. This topic came up several times in different ways: we should talk about gaps, we should say more clearly why this is hard, etc. Suggested Resolution: Add a Requirements section that lays out the hard (or not so hard) problems that any solution must address. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn- yaronf.ietf@… | problem@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: p2p-vpn- | Severity: - problem | Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/trac/ticket/211> ipsecme <http://tools.ietf.org/ipsecme/> _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
