Hi Steve, Like I mentioned the problem is not just exhaustive configuration but also the fact that configuration parameters like IP address change.
I agree we should expand the section you mention below. Thanks, Vishwas On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Stephen Hanna <[email protected]> wrote: > Keeping you entertained in the week before IETF 83... > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: ipsecme issue tracker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 7:03 PM > To: [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: [ipsecme] #218: Exhaustive configuration > > #218: Exhaustive configuration > > Exhaustive configuration can work fine if there are good automated > configuration protocols. > > Suggested Resolution: Exhaustive configuration doesn't scale for > constrained devices in large networks. Explain this in section 3.1. > > -- > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn- > yaronf.ietf@… | problem@… > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: normal | Milestone: > Component: p2p-vpn- | Severity: - > problem | > Keywords: | > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/trac/ticket/218> > ipsecme <http://tools.ietf.org/ipsecme/> > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
