On Mar 21, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Stephen Hanna wrote: > In a simple use case we want hub and spoke topology for say > the DC and the branches. This would also be true of ATM's > connecting to their DC. > > However for scalability reasons we would not want all traffic > to go through the hub. In the ATM example we could want VoIP > session to bypass the DC and have a direct connectivity between > themselves. There are multiple other uses cases for the same. > These new sessions however are temporary, when compared to > permanent branch to hub connections.
Neither ATM nor DC are defined in the current document. It would be better not to introduce new acronyms for a single use case. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
