>>>>> "Yaron" == Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> writes:
    Yaron> I don't want to speak for MCR, but I think you are taking his
    Yaron> question too far towards the implementation aspects. What I
    Yaron> read in the question is, do we allow for a situation where
    Yaron> (by policy and/or because of limitations in the solution) an
    Yaron> endpoint cannot connect directly to the ultimate peer, but
    Yaron> needs instead to go through some sort of relay.

You didn't take my comments too far; I think you realized that I was in
fact saying two things:

1) when traffic is redirected, MUST it be redirected directly to the
   real endpoint?  (There might be issues of in-band double NAT that
   matter if the traffic doesn't get all the way there... I dunno, IPv6
   RFC6145 is my answer to double NAT)

2) when traffic is redirected, MAY it be redirected more than once?

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
                       then sign the petition. 


Attachment: pgphB2ZfurJj1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to