As described in the IPsecME WG meeting I propose that we change the
registration policy for the IPSEC Authentication Methods (Value 3) of
ipsec-registry from the "Standard-Track RFC" to "IETF Review" (From
RFC5226):
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF Review - (Formerly called "IETF Consensus" in
[IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]) New values are assigned only through
RFCs that have been shepherded through the IESG as AD-
Sponsored or IETF WG Documents [RFC3932] [RFC3978]. The
intention is that the document and proposed assignment will
be reviewed by the IESG and appropriate IETF WGs (or
experts, if suitable working groups no longer exist) to
ensure that the proposed assignment will not negatively
impact interoperability or otherwise extend IETF protocols
in an inappropriate or damaging manner.
To ensure adequate community review, such documents are
shepherded through the IESG as AD-sponsored (or WG)
documents with an IETF Last Call.
Examples: IPSECKEY Algorithm Types [RFC4025],
Accounting-Auth-Method AVP values in DIAMETER [RFC4005], TLS
Handshake Hello Extensions [RFC4366].
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I will ask IANA to make the change at the 2012-04-15, unless I get
some objections here in the list.
--
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
