Hi. I've posted version -01 of the draft, addressing some of the issues raised.
Still open issues: * Should we care about IKEv1? * Should retransmissions be forbidden, or just discouraged? * Should liveness checks be sent over TCP? * Should Initial exchange be send over TCP? Hope we can have a fruitful discussion of this both on the list and in Vancouver. Yoav Begin forwarded message: From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01.txt Date: July 16, 2012 10:07:17 AM GMT+03:00 To: Yoav Nir <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> A new version of I-D, draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Yoav Nir and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp Revision: 01 Title: A TCP transport for the Internet Key Exchange Creation date: 2012-07-16 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 8 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01 Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01 Abstract: This document describes using TCP for IKE messages. This facilitates the transport of large messages over paths where fragments are either dropped, or packet loss makes them unreliable.
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
