Hi Paul, One thing that deserves to be on the agenda is a discussion of the need to update the ESP and AH crypto requirements, which have not been updated since 2007, and to provide guidance on how to use ESP and AH to achieve security goals. I have a draft proposing what that could look like, draft-mcgrew-ipsec-me-esp-ah-reqts-00. This is off-charter, but I believe that it is something that many people would agree is worth doing.
Of course, comments on the detailed requirements are welcome as well. David On 10/17/12 10:38 AM, "Paul Hoffman" <[email protected]> wrote: >Greetings again. We have a 2-hour time slot in Atlanta, which is way more >than we asked for. We don't need to be talking about >draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem because it's finished with WG LC and >is being sent to the AD for review. This is a call for agenda items. >Strong preference is given to those which are in the WG charter. > >draft-ietf-ipsecme-ike-tcp-00 is already on the agenda, and hopefully >there will be more discussion of it before the meeting > >--Paul Hoffman >_______________________________________________ >IPsec mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
