On Sun, November 4, 2012 5:29 am, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A general comment: I think we already decided in the WG that we will >> go with the tcp approach, not with this fragmentation layer in the >> IKEv2. Why do we have this document here? > > We don't. Documents listed as "Related Documents" on the Datatracker page > are just that: related. They are not WG work items.
Can IKEv3 be added to the related documents section? Thanks, Dan. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
